Court Orders Arrest Of Briton Over $9.6bn P&ID Fraud
Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court, Abuja has ordered the arrest of a British, James Nolan, for jumping bail and refusing to appear for trial over the $9.6 billion Process and Industrial Development Limited (P&ID).
Nolan, a director of P&ID is standing trial with Lurgi Consult Limited and others in a money laundering case.
In a ruling he delivered on Wednesday, Justice Mohammed said Nolan had broken the terms of his bail and revoked it.
He thereafter issued a bench warrant for Nolan’s arrest.
Mohammed directed Nolan’s surety to appear in court at the next adjourned date to explain why the bail bond should not be forfeited to the court.
The prosecution counsel, Bala Sanga, had earlier prepared to proceed with the cross-examination of prosecuting witness (PW1), Temitope Erinomo, when the court was informed that the second defendant was nowhere to be found and efforts to ascertain his whereabouts proved abortive.
Sanga expressed dismay with the absence of Nolan in court, saying that the first defendant, Lurgi Consult Limited, has never been represented in court, as a corporate body, since the matter started.
He told the court that investigations by the EFCC showed that the property given by the surety, in Gwagwalada, Abuja, was not worth N100 million. He prayed the court to restrain the defence team from further delaying the case.
Responding to the absence of Nolan in court, defence counsel, Michael Ajara, claimed that his sudden disappearance was strange.
“My Lord, the defendant in question, has always appeared in court, except for the last adjourned date that he was sick. His medical report shows that he has bipolar, a history of mental illness and it is uncertain if the defendant is fine. We have notified the police, including the prosecution, and all efforts to ascertain his whereabouts has proven abortive”, he said.
He prayed the court to grant the defence time to ascertain his whereabouts.
However, Justice Mohammed said that the court of law does not act in uncertainty.
“What is clear to the court right now, is that the second defendant is nowhere to be found and there is no justification with certainty of his whereabouts”, he said.
The judge then granted Sanga prayers for the court to revoke the bail of the second defendant, issue a bench warrant for his arrest and and declare his the bail bond forfeited.
